Skip to main content
Author - Maka Pono

LIFE Protocol Trust Mark Usage Guide

Eligibility, Meaning, and Restrictions


Purpose of LIFE Trust Marks

LIFE Trust Marks exist to signal conformance, not endorsement. They communicate that an implementation, application, or organization respects the principles, guarantees, and boundaries of LIFE Core.

Trust Marks do not:

  • certify quality
  • imply approval by a central authority
  • grant exclusivity
  • substitute for legal or regulatory compliance

They exist to reduce ambiguity for users, governments, and partners.


Governing Authority

All LIFE Trust Marks are governed by:

No Trust Mark may be displayed in a manner that conflicts with these documents.


Trust Mark Categories

LIFE Trust Marks are tiered, not hierarchical. Each mark signals a specific scope of conformance.

1. LIFE-Compatible

Who may display this mark

  • Applications
  • Services
  • Tools
  • Documentation

Meaning The system:

  • interoperates with LIFE concepts
  • does not violate LIFE Core principles
  • does not claim full protocol conformance

Typical Use

  • early integrations
  • optional support
  • partial adoption

Restrictions

  • May not imply full compliance
  • May not claim identity or enforcement authority
  • Must disclose scope of compatibility

2. LIFE-Conformant

Who may display this mark

  • Applications
  • SDKs
  • Platforms
  • Infrastructure components

Meaning The system:

  • passes the LIFE Compliance Checklist
  • preserves participant sovereignty
  • avoids custodial identity
  • respects privacy through separation

Typical Use

  • production systems
  • government pilots
  • regulated environments

Restrictions

  • Must not extend into enforcement or adjudication
  • Must support exit and revocation
  • Must disclose deviations or optional modules

3. LIFE-Witnessed

Who may display this mark

  • Infrastructure services
  • Event attestation providers

Meaning The system:

  • performs witness functions
  • attests to event existence and ordering
  • does not adjudicate or enforce

Restrictions

  • May not claim authority over identity
  • May not interpret outcomes
  • May not aggregate participant behavior

4. LIFE-Watched

Who may display this mark

  • Automation services
  • Monitoring or signaling components

Meaning The system:

  • observes conditions or thresholds
  • emits signals without judgment
  • does not surveil individuals

Restrictions

  • May not track identity
  • May not trigger enforcement
  • May not correlate contexts

5. LIFE-Verified (Government / Institutional Use)

Who may display this mark

  • Government pilots
  • Public institutions
  • Regulated entities

Meaning The implementation:

  • has undergone formal conformance review
  • aligns with due-process protections
  • preserves sovereign authority

Restrictions

  • Does not imply government endorsement of LIFE broadly
  • Does not replace legal authority
  • Limited to scope reviewed

Prohibited Uses (Non-Negotiable)

Trust Marks may never be used to imply:

  • ownership of the LIFE Protocol
  • exclusive rights to LIFE
  • centralized authority or control
  • enforcement capability
  • reputation scoring or punishment
  • immunity from law or regulation

Any such use constitutes misrepresentation.


Display Requirements

When displaying a LIFE Trust Mark, the implementer must:

  • include the specific mark name (e.g., LIFE-Conformant)
  • link to the LIFE Conformance Statement
  • disclose scope and limitations
  • avoid visual prominence that implies endorsement

Marks must not be used in a way that misleads non-technical users.


Revocation and Loss of Eligibility

A Trust Mark must be removed if:

  • the implementation no longer passes the Compliance Checklist
  • custodial identity is introduced
  • enforcement logic is added
  • privacy boundaries are violated
  • false claims are made

Trust Marks are conditional, not permanent.


No Central Policing, Explicit Accountability

LIFE does not operate a centralized enforcement body. Instead:

  • Trust Marks rely on clear standards
  • Misrepresentation is objectively verifiable
  • Governments, courts, and partners may rely on published criteria

This preserves decentralization while maintaining accountability.


Canonical Statement

LIFE Trust Marks signal conformance to principles, not permission to control others. They communicate restraint as much as capability.


Intended Audiences

This guide is intended for:

  • developers and platform builders
  • governments and regulators
  • auditors and reviewers
  • legal counsel
  • partners and integrators

Status

This Trust Mark Usage Guide is normative and governed by: LIFE Core: Principles, Guarantees, and Boundaries


What This Completes

With this guide, LIFE now has:

  • a constitution (LIFE Core)
  • a rule of interpretation (Conformance Statement)
  • an operational checklist (Compliance Checklist)
  • a signaling system with teeth but no tyranny (Trust Marks)

This is the full governance stack without centralization.